Case Study — Uxible × Engineering Firm
Case Study
AI Governance
Manufacturing

How we helped an Engineering Firm get a grip on Shadow AI — before it became a problem

Uxible designed and built a simple, governed AI workspace for a 120-person engineering firm — giving staff a safe way to use AI and giving leadership the visibility they were missing.

Client
Engineering Firm
Industry
Precision Parts Manufacturing
Engagement
Discovery → Design → Build → Deploy
Timeline
8 weeks

01 — The Situation

A 120-person manufacturer with no idea what AI its staff were using

This Engineering firm is a Singapore-based precision parts manufacturer supplying components to the aerospace and industrial equipment sectors. With around 120 staff across production, engineering, sales, and admin, they're a tight operation — everyone wears multiple hats, and moving quickly is part of how they stay competitive.

In mid-2024, the Managing Director noticed something: staff were openly using ChatGPT and other AI tools to draft quotes, summarise supplier emails, and write technical documents. No policy covered it. IT had no visibility into it. And some of what was being shared — client specs, pricing models, proprietary process details — wasn't meant to leave the building.

Nobody was being reckless. They were just getting things done. But the exposure was real, and their leadership knew it needed to be addressed before something went wrong.

11
Unsanctioned AI tools
identified in audit
0
Tools with any IT visibility
or data controls
120
Staff using AI
without a safe path

02 — The Problem

Shadow AI isn't just a security issue — it's an organisational blind spot

When Uxible was brought in, we started with a one-week discovery phase — talking to the MD, the ops lead, the sales team, and several engineers. What we found was a pattern common in growing SMEs: AI had crept in organically because it was useful, and nobody had yet built a framework around it.

There was no malice and no major incident — yet. But the risk was real and accumulating quietly. The challenge wasn't to shut AI use down; it was to channel it into something the business could actually stand behind.

Client data and IP shared externally
Staff were pasting client specifications, pricing structures, and process documentation into public AI tools — unaware that this data could be retained or used to train external models.
No compliance footing
As a supplier to regulated industries, they needed to demonstrate data handling standards to clients and auditors. Uncontrolled AI usage created a gap they couldn't easily explain away.
No visibility for management
The MD had no way of knowing what was being shared, with which tools, or by whom. If a client raised a data concern, there was no audit trail to refer to.
Inconsistent quality, no accountability
Different staff using different tools produced wildly inconsistent results. There was no standard, no record-keeping, and no way to verify the quality of AI-assisted work.
"

We weren't doing anything wrong — we just had no system around it. Anyone could be pasting anything into these tools and we'd have no idea. That's not a position we could stay in.

Managing Director

03 — Our Approach

Build the governed path employees actually want to take

Our core design principle was the same as always: the sanctioned tool had to be genuinely more useful than the unsanctioned ones. A clunky internal system would be bypassed within a week. Something that made people's jobs easier — while keeping data safe — would stick.

For an SME like them, we also knew that simplicity mattered. There was no large IT team to manage a complex platform. Whatever we built had to be lightweight enough for the MD to understand and maintain going forward.

1
Discovery & Usage Mapping
We spent one week talking to their staff across every function — engineering, sales, admin, and the MD himself. We documented every AI tool in use, the tasks it was supporting, and what data was being shared. In a business of 120 people, this gave us a complete and honest picture quickly.
2
Solution Design & Architecture
We designed a simple, secure AI workspace built on a private cloud deployment — keeping all data within their own environment. No complex enterprise infrastructure required. We kept the architecture deliberately lean so it could be managed by the existing team without a dedicated IT resource.
3
UX Design & Staff Testing
We ran two rounds of usability testing with 15 staff members spanning engineering, procurement, and sales. The ask was simple: use this instead of what you're using now, and tell us where it falls short. The feedback shaped a focused set of task-specific tools — quote drafting, technical write-ups, supplier research — that mapped directly to real daily needs.
4
Build, Deploy & Handover
The platform was built and deployed in four weeks, with a company-wide rollout in week five. We trained all staff in a single half-day session and handed over a simple admin guide so they could manage access, review usage logs, and update settings without needing to come back to us.

04 — The Solution

AideBridge — Their own governed AI workspace

We designed and built AideBridge: a lightweight, private AI workspace deployed within their own cloud environment. Staff get access to the AI tools they actually need — quoting, technical writing, supplier research — without any of their data touching a public AI service.

The MD can see who's using it, what for, and flag anything that looks out of place. There's no IT team required to keep it running. And because it's built around their real workflows, staff actually prefer it to the tools they were using before.

Private deployment
Runs within their own cloud. Data never reaches third-party AI providers.
Role-based access
Each staff member sees only the tools and data relevant to their role.
Full usage logging
Every session is logged and searchable — a clear record for management and client audits.
Task-specific workspaces
Purpose-built tools for quoting, technical write-ups, and supplier research — not a generic chatbot.
Data guardrails
Configurable rules that warn or block staff from sharing certain categories of sensitive information.
Simple admin dashboard
The MD can review usage, manage access, and update settings — no technical background needed.
Single sign-on
Staff log in with their existing company credentials — no new passwords to manage.
Mobile-friendly
Accessible from any device — useful for staff on the production floor or visiting clients.
Updatable & scalable
Built to grow with them — new tools and roles can be added without rebuilding from scratch.

05 — Results

From invisible risk to measurable control — in 8 weeks

AideBridge launched to their full team in Q4 2024. Within four weeks of rollout, the results were clear — both on the risk side and in day-to-day productivity. Staff adopted it readily because it was genuinely useful, not because they were told to.

96%
Reduction in unsanctioned tool usage
Monitored via network logs four weeks post-launch. The remaining usage was one tool under review for potential approved integration.
100%
Usage visibility for management
For the first time, the MD could see exactly what AI was being used for and by whom — with a clear log available for any client or audit query.
110+
Active users within 3 weeks
Almost every eligible staff member adopted AideBridge voluntarily — driven by the task-specific tools built around their actual work.
~12 hrs
Saved per week on quoting and proposals
The AI-assisted quotation tool cut the time spent on RFQ drafting significantly — a meaningful gain for a lean sales team.
Client-ready
Data handling posture for audits
They can now demonstrate controlled AI usage to customers and auditors — turning a liability into a point of confidence.
S$0
Data incidents since launch
No data-related incidents or client complaints linked to AI usage since deployment — compared to one near-miss in the year prior.
M

"I didn't expect something this polished for a company our size. Uxible understood that we're not a big corporate — we just needed something that works, that our team would actually use, and that I could explain to a client if they ever asked. That's exactly what we got."

Marcus
Managing Director

06 — Key Takeaways

What this engagement taught us about Shadow AI in SMEs

SMEs face the same risks as large enterprises — with less buffer. A data incident or client complaint about mishandled information hits a 120-person business harder than it hits a multinational. The risk isn't smaller; the margin for error is.

Shadow AI in SMEs is more visible — and more fixable. In a smaller business, the MD often already has a sense of what's happening. The gap isn't awareness; it's having a practical solution that fits the scale and budget of the business. That's where Uxible comes in.

Staff don't resist governance — they resist friction. Every staff member at their organization was happy to switch to AideBridge once it proved more useful than what they were using before. The key was building around their real tasks, not around an IT policy document.

Lightweight doesn't mean less secure. We didn't need to overbuild. A well-architected, right-sized solution — private deployment, simple access controls, clear logging — delivered everything they needed without unnecessary complexity or ongoing cost.

Shadow AI SME AI Governance Data Security Private AI Deployment UX Design Manufacturing Change Management Platform Development Singapore

Running a similar business?

Shadow AI is a growing problem for SMEs — and one most don't tackle until something goes wrong. We can help you get ahead of it, without the complexity or cost of an enterprise solution.

Start a conversation Or explore more case studies below
Scroll to Top